Slide 00
Auroville: Its Struggle in the Quest for a Spiritual Utopia - A New Perspective

This book is offered as an explorer ’s source book in the mapping of various psychological problems inherent in the practice of Sri Aurobindo’s integral sadhana. There are possible dangers in working with spiritual and psychological domains simultaneously and the various pitfalls are extensively elaborated in this book, because knowing about them can lessen the dangers.

This book attempts to give a critical commentary on the current events within the Auroville community. It poses questions that require collective answers to understand the underlying causes of the difficulties and obstacles that currently divide the community. What are the citizens' understanding of their ideals in Auroville, and how do they move to achieve their ideals? To what extent is Auroville capable of adapting to the changing needs of its citizens and implementing external changes? Are their ideals still able to influence the larger society?
The author's dissecting attitude aims at a minute and critical examination of Auroville's present complicated situation, by removing various appearances from different ill-considered issues, because behind these appearances, there might be a reality that is much closer to the truth and may offer a better understanding. He presents Auroville's crisis not as a sugar-coated spiritual utopia, knowing that such an attitude might hurt the sentiments of the citizens.
The author is aware that the engagement of some of his views, as expressed in this work, might not be acceptable for government officials and those Aurovilians who support them; in their view, no communication should negatively portray Auroville, and as a consequence, the elaboration of the author's deep-rooted personal questions might not serve the community in the spirit of a meaningful experiment. But does such an attitude of censorship and only " Government Media Policy" transparent reporting contribute much toward a unified experiment among the various opposing, fragmented views of all the citizens?

previous arrow
next arrow